nanog mailing list archives
Re: [fergie-spew] RE: FW: Crews Survey Rita's Damages
From: "Fergie (Paul Ferguson)" <fergdawg () netzero net>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 02:21:54 GMT
I take issue with what you folks think is relative. It's _clearly_ unbalanced, unfair, and biased. I'm in the process of turning back up a major portion of the state network over the next couple of days hete in texas, and reports of network status is somehow not on-topic? I'm thinking that NANOG is just completely FUBAR'd... You guys can have your boys club. As for the rest of the readership, I'm Sorry you are ending up with a mailing list that is ruled by a select few, who have decided that they wish to control the content of "operations". What a damned shame. Good bye, - ferg -- Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote: paul, begging the point of whether news about telco, not internet, circuits and wireless is ot for nanog, i think all martin was asking is a subject: tag for for your news posts, as he seems to have a brain-dead mua (which is highly popular for some reason) with very limited filtering capabilities. i don't think he meant it as a personal attack; i assume you would know one if he did:-). randy -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg () netzero net or fergdawg () sbcglobal net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
Current thread:
- [fergie-spew] RE: FW: Crews Survey Rita's Damages Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Sep 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [fergie-spew] RE: FW: Crews Survey Rita's Damages Hannigan, Martin (Sep 25)
- Re: [fergie-spew] RE: FW: Crews Survey Rita's Damages Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 25)
- Re: [fergie-spew] RE: FW: Crews Survey Rita's Damages Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Sep 25)
- Re: [fergie-spew] RE: FW: Crews Survey Rita's Damages Christopher L. Morrow (Sep 25)
- Re: [fergie-spew] RE: FW: Crews Survey Rita's Damages Gregory Hicks (Sep 25)