nanog mailing list archives
Re: SORBS Contact
From: Matthew Sullivan <matthew () sorbs net>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:59:45 +1000
Mark Andrews wrote:
Actually that's debatable - the SORBS DUHL is about IPs assigned to hosts/people/machines dynamically. We do not list addresses where the ISP have sent the list explictitly saying 'these are static hosts, but they are not allowed to send mail' - similarly we do list hosts in the DUHL where the ISP has said 'these are dynamic but we allow them to send mail' - it's about the people using the SORBS DUHL for their purposes, not for helping ISPs getting around the issue of whether to use SORBS as a replacement to port 25 blocking.Actually there can be false positive. ISP's who put address blocks into "dialup" blocks which have the qualification that the ISP is also supposed to only do it if they *don't* allow email from the block but the ISP's policy explicitly allows email to be sent.
Regards, Mat
Current thread:
- Re: SORBS Contact, (continued)
- Re: SORBS Contact Robert E . Seastrom (Aug 10)
- rDNS naming conventions (was: Re: SORBS Contact) Steven Champeon (Aug 10)
- Re: rDNS naming conventions (was: Re: SORBS Contact) Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 10)
- Re: rDNS naming conventions (was: Re: SORBS Contact) Steven Champeon (Aug 10)
- Re: rDNS naming conventions (was: Re: SORBS Contact) Nicholas Suan (Aug 10)
- Re: rDNS naming conventions (was: Re: SORBS Contact) bmanning (Aug 10)
- Re: rDNS naming conventions (was: Re: SORBS Contact) Edward Lewis (Aug 10)
- Re: SORBS Contact Peter Corlett (Aug 10)
- Re: SORBS Contact Andrew D Kirch (Aug 11)
- Re: SORBS Contact Mark Andrews (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Matthew Sullivan (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Mark Andrews (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Matthew Sullivan (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Noel (Aug 10)
- Re: SORBS Contact Joe Maimon (Aug 10)
- RE: SORBS Contact David Schwartz (Aug 13)
- Re: SORBS Contact Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 13)
- Re: SORBS Contact D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Aug 14)
- RE: SORBS Contact David Schwartz (Aug 14)