nanog mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft Corporate Postmaster Contact?
From: "Al Iverson" <aliversonchicagolists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:30:27 -0600
On 12/18/06, S. Ryan <auser () mind net> wrote:
I don't think it should ever be acceptable to have to 'sign up' to report a security/network problem.
Apples and oranges -- this isn't signing up to report a security issue. SNDS is Microsoft provindg you data regarding what they can see about your IPs sending mail to Microsoft's networks. It certainly appears to be optional. If you are an ISP or somebody else sending any sort of significant amount of mail, it can be very useful. I've found it quite helpful. In theory, the point of registration is to track which data is given to whom, to prevent abuse. When/if you choose to apply, somebody at a published network administrator address will be sent an email requesting permission to give the registered user access to the data. Regards, Al Iverson ExactTarget -- Al Iverson -- www.aliverson.com Visit my blog: www.spamresource.com
Current thread:
- Microsoft Corporate Postmaster Contact? Ken Simpson (Dec 15)
- RE: Microsoft Corporate Postmaster Contact? Jay Stewart (Dec 18)
- RE: Microsoft Corporate Postmaster Contact? Steve Sobol (Dec 18)
- Re: Microsoft Corporate Postmaster Contact? S. Ryan (Dec 18)
- Re: Microsoft Corporate Postmaster Contact? Steve Atkins (Dec 18)
- Re: Microsoft Corporate Postmaster Contact? Al Iverson (Dec 18)
- Re: Microsoft Corporate Postmaster Contact? Steve Sobol (Dec 19)
- RE: Microsoft Corporate Postmaster Contact? Steve Sobol (Dec 18)
- Re: Microsoft Corporate Postmaster Contact? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 18)
- RE: Microsoft Corporate Postmaster Contact? Jay Stewart (Dec 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Microsoft Corporate Postmaster Contact? Steve Sobol (Dec 18)