nanog mailing list archives
Re: today's Wash Post Business section
From: Joseph S D Yao <jsdy () center osis gov>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:15:23 -0500
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 10:53:04AM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote: ...
(Hint - how much smaller would the spam problem be if end users actually looked at their cable or DSL modem and wondered why the Tx/Rx lights were on steady even though nothing was apparently happening?)
You appear to be assuming that they might consider them to mean something other than Christmas decorations all year. -- Joe Yao ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This message is not an official statement of OSIS Center policies.
Current thread:
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section, (continued)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section James Blessing (Dec 21)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Robert Bonomi (Dec 21)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Alexander Harrowell (Dec 21)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Andy Davidson (Dec 21)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Richard P. Welty (Dec 21)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 21)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Jeff Shultz (Dec 21)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section J. Oquendo (Dec 21)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Thomas Leavitt (Dec 23)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Michael Painter (Dec 23)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Alexander Harrowell (Dec 21)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Joseph S D Yao (Dec 21)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Mark Andrews (Dec 21)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Jim Popovitch (Dec 21)