nanog mailing list archives
Re: Security of National Infrastructure
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 12:27:47 -1000
Why is it that every company out there allows connections through their firewalls to their web and mail infrastructure from countries that they don't even do business in. Shouldn't it be our default to only allow US based IP addresses and then allow others as needed? The only case I can think of would be traveling folks that need to VPN or something, which could be permitted in the Firewall, but WHY WIDE OPEN ACCESS? We still seem to be in the wild west, but no-one has the b@lls to be braven and block the unnecessary access.
maybe because those godless communist sexually deviant vicious perverts out there in the rest of the world are damned hard to differentiate from the sexually deviant vicious perverts we have in our government? and there money is still good. you may want to look at the balance of trade and worry about the opposite flow. sheesh! randy
Current thread:
- Security of National Infrastructure The Shadow (Dec 29)
- Re: Security of National Infrastructure Randy Bush (Dec 29)
- Re: Security of National Infrastructure Jerry Pasker (Dec 29)
- Re: Security of National Infrastructure Petri Helenius (Dec 29)
- Re: Security of National Infrastructure Chris L. Morrow (Dec 29)
- Re: Security of National Infrastructure Alexander Harrowell (Dec 30)
- Re: Security of National Infrastructure Jerry Pasker (Dec 29)
- Re: Security of National Infrastructure Joseph S D Yao (Dec 29)
- Re: Security of National Infrastructure Kevin Day (Dec 29)
- Re: Security of National Infrastructure Peter Corlett (Dec 29)
- Re: Security of National Infrastructure Mark Foster (Dec 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Security of National Infrastructure Scott Weeks (Dec 29)
- Re: Security of National Infrastructure Randy Bush (Dec 29)