nanog mailing list archives
Re: protocols that don't meet the need...
From: "Andrew Dul" <andrew.dul () quark net>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:55:23 +0000
-------Original Message------- From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu Subject: Re: protocols that don't meet the need... Sent: 14 Feb '06 13:10 On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:35:19 PST, Tony Hain said: > Rather than sit back and complain about the results, why not try to > synchronize meeting times. Not necessarily hotels, but within a reasonable > distance of each other so the issue about ROI for the trip can be mitigated.
Not a substitute for attendance and face-to-face meetings, but ISOC has started publishing the IETF journal. It is a pretty long read, but I've found it useful to catchup on working groups. http://ietfjournal.isoc.org/
Current thread:
- RE: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...), (continued)
- RE: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Matthew Kaufman (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Joe Abley (Feb 16)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 16)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Joe Abley (Feb 16)
- Re: protocols that don't meet the need... Per Heldal (Feb 15)
- Re: protocols that don't meet the need... Alexei Roudnev (Feb 16)
- Re: protocols that don't meet the need... Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 16)
- Re: protocols that don't meet the need... Andre Oppermann (Feb 16)
- Re: protocols that don't meet the need... David Meyer (Feb 15)
- Re: protocols that don't meet the need... Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 15)