nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco, haven't we learned anything? (technician reset)
From: eric <eric-list-nanog () catastrophe net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:38:44 -0600
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 01:30:52 +0200, Gadi Evron proclaimed...
Checking into new investments security-wise, especially with security products and external QA may help solve such issues in the future.
Thank you for this interruption. We now returned to our scheduled programming, already in progress.
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco, haven't we learned anything? (technician reset), (continued)
- Re: Cisco, haven't we learned anything? (technician reset) Jay Hennigan (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco, haven't we learned anything? (technician reset) william(at)elan.net (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco, haven't we learned anything? (technician reset) Jay Hennigan (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco, haven't we learned anything? (technician reset) william(at)elan.net (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco, haven't we learned anything? (technician reset)y Martin Hannigan (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco, haven't we learned anything? (technician reset)y Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco, haven't we learned anything? (technician reset)y eric (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco, haven't we learned anything? (technician reset)y Martin Hannigan (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco, haven't we learned anything? (technician reset)y Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco, haven't we learned anything? (technician reset) Jay Hennigan (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco, haven't we learned anything? (technician reset) eric (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco, haven't we learned anything? (technician reset) Martin Hannigan (Jan 12)