nanog mailing list archives
Re: So -- what did happen to Panix?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 01:22:01 -0500
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 07:54:30 +0200, Pekka Savola said:
It'd be darn difficult to engineer a solution that would end up being deployed in any reasonable time if we don't know the requirements first.
Fortunately, when we know the requirements and engineer a solution, deployment is straightforward. RFC2827, for example, has a stellar deployment record. In other words - what is the business case for deploying this proposed solution? I may be able to get things deployed at $WORK by arguing that it's The Right Thing To Do, but at most shops an ROI calculation needs to be attached to get movement....
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- So -- what did happen to Panix? Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 25)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? william(at)elan.net (Jan 25)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Pekka Savola (Jan 25)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 25)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Pekka Savola (Jan 25)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 25)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Daniel Golding (Jan 26)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Matt Buford (Jan 26)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Pekka Savola (Jan 25)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? william(at)elan.net (Jan 25)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Jared Mauch (Jan 26)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Josh Karlin (Jan 26)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Jared Mauch (Jan 26)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Josh Karlin (Jan 26)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Randy Bush (Jan 26)