nanog mailing list archives
Re: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 22:00:11 -0400
On Jul 10, 2006, at 9:48 PM, WONG, Yuen-Fung wrote:
Sometimes earlier this year someone announced this 128/1 and caused heavy loading to our routers to rebuild the CEF. Would anyone filter out this route (and other similar routes such as 0/1, 128/1, 0/2, 64/2, .... up to /4, for example) as bogus routes?
Would anyone not filter those routes? Why wouldn't you filter to /7?Actually, I take that back. Why wouldn't you just get a feed from Cymru <http://www.cymru.com/Bogons/index.html> ??
-- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1 WONG, Yuen-Fung (Jul 10)
- Re: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1 Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 10)
- Message not available
- Re: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1 Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 10)
- Message not available
- Re: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1 Jerry Pasker (Jul 10)
- Re: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1 Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 10)
- Re: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1 Rob Thomas (Jul 10)
- Re: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1 John Kristoff (Jul 10)
- Re: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1 Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 10)
- Re: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1 Florian Weimer (Jul 11)
- Re: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1 Joe Abley (Jul 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1 WONG, Yuen-Fung (Jul 10)
- RE: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1 WONG, Yuen-Fung (Jul 12)