nanog mailing list archives
Re: Net Neutrality Legislative Proposal
From: Sabri Berisha <sabri () cluecentral net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:46:56 +0200
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 03:25:55PM -0400, Seth Johnson wrote: Hi,
So far, much of the argument over "net neutrality" has been over whether service providers should be allowed to favor one application, destination or Internet service over another. This is Net neutrality at the application layer. But the real issue is the neutrality of the IP layer where routers treat alike bits from every type of application.
So, what happened to "my network, my rules"? Perhaps I'm not seeing the point here, but what on earth does a government has to do with the question wether or not a service provider implements QoS on his network? Thanks, -- Sabri ENOSUNSHINE when $SHE == gone
Current thread:
- Re: Net Neutrality Legislative Proposal, (continued)
- Re: Net Neutrality Legislative Proposal Florian Weimer (Jul 11)
- Re: Net Neutrality Legislative Proposal Mark Newton (Jul 11)
- Re: Net Neutrality Legislative Proposal Florian Weimer (Jul 11)
- Re: Net Neutrality Legislative Proposal Mark Newton (Jul 11)
- Re: Net Neutrality Legislative Proposal Florian Weimer (Jul 11)
- Re: Net Neutrality Legislative Proposal Mark Newton (Jul 11)
- Re: Net Neutrality Legislative Proposal Florian Weimer (Jul 11)
- Re: Net Neutrality Legislative Proposal Mark Newton (Jul 11)
- Re: Net Neutrality Legislative Proposal Florian Weimer (Jul 11)
- Re: Net Neutrality Legislative Proposal Keith Mitchell (Jul 12)
- Re: Net Neutrality Legislative Proposal Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 12)
- RE: Net Neutrality Legislative Proposal Joe Johnson (Jul 11)
- Re: Net Neutrality Legislative Proposal Florian Weimer (Jul 11)