Re: ICANN at risk

["Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () verizonbusiness com>]

On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Fergie wrote:

> Interesting timing, indeed, considering the UK is beginning
> (again?) to examine alternatives -- and Nominet playing a role
> there, too:
>
>  http://technology.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1812343,00.html

So, with ICANN 'now' starting to forge alliances and make partnerships,
despite some possibly bad moves early on, and despite some overly heavy
handedness on the USGov's part over the years. Is 'no more ICANN' really a
good move? Jay seems to make a good point, the devil you know vs the 'new'
devil :(

Would some/all of the ICANN situation been different had the  USGov't just
walked away one day one?

> -- Tony Finch <dot () dotat at> wrote:
>
> The timing is interesting, given that DENIC and Nominet have recently
> come to an agreement of sorts with ICANN.