nanog mailing list archives

RE: Interesting new spam technique - getting a lot more popular.

From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () verizonbusiness com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 19:39:30 +0000 (GMT)



On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Church, Chuck wrote:


Since this technique requires a IPinIP or GRE tunnel, wouldn't blocking
these two protocols to/from the hosts be sufficient?  Assuming of course
the customer's host isn't using that normally.


sure, but those are probably just convenience things, what happens when
they setup an ssl tunnel? or http tunnel or ping tunnel?

Current thread:

Re: Interesting new spam technique - getting a lot more popular., (continued)
- - Re: Interesting new spam technique - getting a lot more popular. Chris Edwards (Jun 14)
  - Re: Interesting new spam technique - getting a lot more popular. Florian Weimer (Jun 14)
- RE: Interesting new spam technique - getting a lot more popular. John van Oppen (Jun 13)
  - Re: Interesting new spam technique - getting a lot more popular. Payam Chychi (Jun 13)
  - RE: Interesting new spam technique - getting a lot more popular. Edward B. DREGER (Jun 13)
- RE: Interesting new spam technique - getting a lot more popular. John van Oppen (Jun 14)
  - Re: Interesting new spam technique - getting a lot more popular. Warren Kumari (Jun 14)
    - Re: Interesting new spam technique - getting a lot more popular. Mark Smith (Jun 15)
- RE: Interesting new spam technique - getting a lot more popular. Church, Chuck (Jun 14)
  - Re: Interesting new spam technique - getting a lot more popular. Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 14)
  - RE: Interesting new spam technique - getting a lot more popular. Christopher L. Morrow (Jun 14)
- RE: Interesting new spam technique - getting a lot more popular. Peter Phaal (Jun 15)