nanog mailing list archives
Re: key change for TCP-MD5
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:29:40 -0700
I'd still like someone to explain why we're wasting man hours, CPU time, filling up our router logs, and potentially making DoS easier, for an attack that doesn't exist.
because the non-existent attack(s) have occurred. and keys have been compomised. randy
Current thread:
- RE: key change for TCP-MD5, (continued)
- RE: key change for TCP-MD5 Bora Akyol (Jun 20)
- Re: key change for TCP-MD5 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 20)
- Re: key change for TCP-MD5 Randy Bush (Jun 20)
- Re: key change for TCP-MD5 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 20)
- Re: key change for TCP-MD5 Crist Clark (Jun 20)
- Re: key change for TCP-MD5 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 20)
- Re: key change for TCP-MD5 Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 20)
- RE: key change for TCP-MD5 Bora Akyol (Jun 20)
- RE: key change for TCP-MD5 Randy Bush (Jun 20)
- Re: key change for TCP-MD5 Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 20)
- Re: key change for TCP-MD5 Warren Kumari (Jun 20)
- Re: key change for TCP-MD5 Randy Bush (Jun 20)
- Re: key change for TCP-MD5 Ross Callon (Jun 21)
- Re: key change for TCP-MD5 David Barak (Jun 21)
- Re: key change for TCP-MD5 Jared Mauch (Jun 21)
- Re: key change for TCP-MD5 Randy Bush (Jun 21)
- RE: key change for TCP-MD5 Randy Bush (Jun 21)
- Re: key change for TCP-MD5 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 21)