nanog mailing list archives
Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne)
From: David Barak <thegameiam () yahoo com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:12:58 -0800 (PST)
--- Tony Li <tony.li () tony li> wrote:
Consider that the IETF *could* conceivably require every compliant v6 implementation to include it.
God Forbid. I somehow don't want my core routers deciding to speak shim6... David Barak Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise: http://www.listentothefranchise.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Current thread:
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne), (continued)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Mark Newton (Mar 04)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Stephen Sprunk (Mar 04)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Geoff Huston (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Mar 04)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Marshall Eubanks (Mar 04)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Geoff Huston (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Joe Abley (Mar 01)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Marshall Eubanks (Mar 02)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Tony Li (Mar 02)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) David Barak (Mar 02)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Stephen Sprunk (Mar 03)
- absense of multicast deployment Joe Abley (Mar 03)
- Re: absense of multicast deployment Marshall Eubanks (Mar 03)
- Re: absense of multicast deployment John Kristoff (Mar 03)
- Re: absense of multicast deployment Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Mar 04)
- Re: absense of multicast deployment Stephen Sprunk (Mar 03)
- Re: absense of multicast deployment Edward B. DREGER (Mar 03)