nanog mailing list archives
Re: shim6 @ NANOG
From: Paul Jakma <paul () clubi ie>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 00:12:47 +0000 (GMT)
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
Hm, I would rather do this globally but maybe this is the way to go...
Geo-aggregation is something that stands its best chance of being implemented locally:
- the 'players' involved will be fewer - requirements for a workable policy will be easier to work out (and fewer conflicts between requirements) - there may be existing 'arbiter of last resort' (particularly at national levels) to resolve the inevitable conflicts.Ie this may be best done even /below/ the RIR level (though, RIR agreement would be needed).
Still though, hard to see it happening without some acceptance by operators.
regards, -- Paul Jakma paul () clubi ie paul () jakma org Key ID: 64A2FF6A Fortune: The public is an old woman. Let her maunder and mumble. -- Thomas Carlyle
Current thread:
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG, (continued)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 05)
- Message not available
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 06)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Owen DeLong (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Joe Abley (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Stephen Sprunk (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Joe Abley (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Roland Dobbins (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 06)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Owen DeLong (Mar 06)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 07)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Paul Jakma (Mar 07)
- RE: shim6 @ NANOG Tony Hain (Mar 07)
- RE: shim6 @ NANOG Paul Jakma (Mar 07)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Owen DeLong (Mar 07)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG John Curran (Mar 07)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Edward B. DREGER (Mar 07)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Owen DeLong (Mar 07)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Tony Li (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 06)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Stephen Sprunk (Mar 06)