nanog mailing list archives
Re: firewall recommendations?
From: Alain Hebert <ahebert () pubnix net>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:17:17 -0500
Hi, (From what I understand)In fact you dont need any firewall functionality, no complex loggin, no reporting, no intrusion detection... so.
High availability, Load Balancing and NAT support:A pair of Foundry ServerIron XL would do the trick and cheap... They also have Gbps Uplink Ports (Copper/Fibre).
Matt Hess wrote:
I'm looking for a firewall that has a very high packet throughput rate, can handle minimal stun tasks, do server load balancing for http etc., handle many-to-one as well as bi-directional NAT and just plain works with high reliability/redundancy.Suggestions off list would be wonderful. Thanks.
--Alain Hebert ahebert () pubnix net PubNIX Inc. P.O. Box 175 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 5T7
tel 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net fax 514-990-9443
Current thread:
- firewall recommendations? Matt Hess (Mar 22)
- Re: firewall recommendations? Alain Hebert (Mar 22)