nanog mailing list archives
that 4byte ASN you were considering...
From: bmanning () karoshi com
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 20:48:34 +0000
FYI... ifyou think you have an opinion about this, it might be worth a read before the IESG dictates how you can use/code these badboys... ----- The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the following document: - 'Canonical representation of 4-byte AS numbers ' <draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation-01.txt> as an Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send any comments to the iesg () ietf org or ietf () ietf org mailing lists by 2006-11-06. The file can be obtained via http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation-01.txt --bill
Current thread:
- that 4byte ASN you were considering... bmanning (Oct 09)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Randy Bush (Oct 09)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Kevin Loch (Oct 09)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Randy Bush (Oct 10)
- RE: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Neil J. McRae (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... David W. Hankins (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Joe Abley (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... David W. Hankins (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Michael Shields (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... David W. Hankins (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Kevin Loch (Oct 09)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Randy Bush (Oct 09)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... william(at)elan.net (Oct 10)