nanog mailing list archives
Re: [OT] Connexion {Was: Re: [routing-wg]BGP Update Report}
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () cs columbia edu>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:24:52 -0400
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 09:08:56 -0500, Netfortius <netfortius () gmail com> wrote:
Just wondering this, myself. I travel fairly frequently between US and Europe, and Lufthansa was recently my choice, exclusively because of this service. Perhaps with the interdiction of computing devices on board (have not travelled since the UK incident, so I am not sure if the new rules of flying naked affect all flights?!?) there won't - obviously - be much of a need for an Internet connection ...
The main issue, from what I read, is that too few airlines followed suit. In particular, most American airlines were far too strapped financially to invest in the necessary equipment. --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
Current thread:
- BGP Update Report cidr-report (Sep 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- BGP Update Report cidr-report (Sep 08)
- Re: [routing-wg]BGP Update Report Hank Nussbacher (Sep 08)
- Re: [routing-wg]BGP Update Report Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 08)
- Re: [routing-wg]BGP Update Report Bill Woodcock (Sep 08)
- Re: [routing-wg]BGP Update Report Joe Provo (Sep 08)
- Re: [routing-wg]BGP Update Report Michael Painter (Sep 09)
- Re: [routing-wg]BGP Update Report Brandon Galbraith (Sep 09)
- [OT] Connexion {Was: Re: [routing-wg]BGP Update Report} Netfortius (Sep 10)
- Re: [OT] Connexion {Was: Re: [routing-wg]BGP Update Report} Steven M. Bellovin (Sep 10)
- Re: [OT] Connexion {Was: Re: [routing-wg]BGP Update Report} Richard A Steenbergen (Sep 10)
- Re: [OT] Connexion {Was: Re: [routing-wg]BGP Update Report} Robert E . Seastrom (Sep 10)
- Re: [OT] Connexion {Was: Re: [routing-wg]BGP Update Report} Marshall Eubanks (Sep 10)
- Re: [routing-wg]BGP Update Report Hank Nussbacher (Sep 08)
- Re: [routing-wg]BGP Update Report Carlos Friacas (Sep 11)