nanog mailing list archives

Re: Watch your replies (was Kremen....)


From: Frank Coluccio <frank () dticonsulting com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:47:31 -0500


Perhaps the list should be turned into a wiki; and no, while I'd like to, I'm not
at this time volunteering to admin ;)

Frank A. Coluccio
DTI Consulting Inc.
212-587-8150 Office
347-526-6788 Mobile

On Wed Sep 13 15:43 , Michael.Dillon () btradianz com sent:


It's insulting
when you trim the message to a shorter statement that you are
responding to.  The other 18 lines may not have been important to this
particular response but they were not content free.

If your content was in any way, interesting, then people
will have read it in the message that you posted. I see
no need to repeat a bunch of irrelevant text when I am
only replying to one point in your email.

Personally, I wish more people would trim away all the
irrelevant junk when replying.

On the other hand, in the corporate world I find that
the habit of top posting is very useful to me. I often
see things that were never intended to be sent to me
and I often discover that the previous replies in a thread
betray the fact that the writer did not read or did not
understand the original message. 

But on a mailing list, trimmed replies are superior.

--Michael Dillon

P.S. are the standards of this list so unclear that
Darcy and I have to discuss this? Who is right?





Current thread: