nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spain was offline
From: Joe Abley <jabley () ca afilias info>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 12:37:53 -0400
On 1-Sep-2006, at 02:11, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>You seem to be suggesting that ISPs run stealth slaves for these >kinds of zones. This may have been a useful pointer for ISPs in days >gone by, but I think today it's impractical advice. How so? Anyone can get a zone and turn up [a-m] on-net and outperform (response and uptime) many of the existing instances of root servers.
The root servers are easy; the zone is tiny and the update frequency is miniscule.
We were talking about TLD servers. Joe
Current thread:
- Re: Spain was offline Joe Abley (Sep 01)
- Re: Spain was offline Martin Hannigan (Sep 01)
- Re: Spain was offline Joe Abley (Sep 01)
- Re: Spain was offline Martin Hannigan (Sep 01)
- Re: Spain was offline Joe Abley (Sep 01)
- Re: Spain was offline Martin Hannigan (Sep 01)
- Re: Spain was offline Keith Mitchell (Sep 01)
- Re: Spain was offline Joe Abley (Sep 01)
- Re: Spain was offline Martin Hannigan (Sep 01)
- Re: Spain was offline Daniel Karrenberg (Sep 04)
- Re: Spain was offline Michael . Dillon (Sep 04)
- Re: Spain was offline steve (Sep 04)
- Re: Spain was offline Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 04)