nanog mailing list archives
RE: summarising [was: Re: ICANNs role]
From: <michael.dillon () bt com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 21:16:47 +0100
Again - DNS is the infrastructure for EVERYTHING. It facilitates EVERYTHING.
Not so. On the public Internet applications like Edonkey and Emule work fine without it. We run a global IP network that is not connected to the public Internet and over 90% of our customers' applications don't use any DNS. They use IP addresses directly. DNS is only a facilitator for those applications that WANT to use it. And even though most current applications want to use DNS, they usually function just fine with straight IP addresses. DNS is more of a habit, than a necessity. If the users of the Internet, collectively, decide that DNS is a bad habit, better to be avoided, then you will see more and more applications that work around the DNS. Like ICQ. Or they will only use the DNS minimally in order to root their own namespaces, like LDAP with RFC 2247. --Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- Re: ICANNs role [was: Re: On-going ...] Fergie (Apr 02)
- summarising [was: Re: ICANNs role] Gadi Evron (Apr 02)
- Re: summarising [was: Re: ICANNs role] Joseph S D Yao (Apr 03)
- RE: summarising [was: Re: ICANNs role] michael.dillon (Apr 03)
- Re: summarising [was: Re: ICANNs role] Joseph S D Yao (Apr 03)
- Re: summarising [was: Re: ICANNs role] Sam Stickland (Apr 03)
- Re: summarising [was: Re: ICANNs role] Joseph S D Yao (Apr 03)
- Re: summarising [was: Re: ICANNs role] Douglas Otis (Apr 03)
- Re: summarising [was: Re: ICANNs role] Joe Greco (Apr 03)
- Re: summarising [was: Re: ICANNs role] Daniel Senie (Apr 03)
- Re: summarising [was: Re: ICANNs role] Joe Greco (Apr 03)
- Re: summarising [was: Re: ICANNs role] Dorn Hetzel (Apr 04)
- Re: summarising [was: Re: ICANNs role] Joseph S D Yao (Apr 04)
- Re: summarising [was: Re: ICANNs role] Joe Greco (Apr 04)
- Re: summarising [was: Re: ICANNs role] Joseph S D Yao (Apr 03)
- summarising [was: Re: ICANNs role] Gadi Evron (Apr 02)