nanog mailing list archives
RE: GoDaddy's abuse procedures [was: ICANNs role [was: Re: On-going ...]]
From: "Chris L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () verizonbusiness com>
Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 20:54:18 +0000 (GMT)
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Frank Bulk wrote:
While you have your friend's ear, ask him why they maintain a spam policy of blocking complete /24's when: a) the space has been divided into multiple sub-blocks and assigned to different companies, all well-documented and queryable in ARIN b) there have been repeated pleas to whitelist a certain IP in separate sub-block that is only being punished for the behavior of others in a different sub-block.
because it's go-daddy's policy not yours and their customers aren't upset enough about 'broken' email to force a change? If you are a go-daddy customer you ought to speak up if this policy really does affect you. -Chris
Current thread:
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks, (continued)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Peter Dambier (Apr 07)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Rich Kulawiec (Apr 07)
- Message not available
- RE: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Frank Bulk (Apr 07)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Chris Owen (Apr 07)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Stephen Satchell (Apr 07)
- RE: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Frank Bulk (Apr 07)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Paul Vixie (Apr 08)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Rich Kulawiec (Apr 10)
- RE: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks michael.dillon (Apr 10)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Joseph S D Yao (Apr 10)