nanog mailing list archives
Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks
From: "Fergie" <fergdawg () netzero net>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 03:33:04 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- Chris Owen <owenc () hubris net> wrote:
On Apr 8, 2007, at 2:51 AM, Fergie wrote:Again, a simple recursive WHOIS will show you sub-allocations if they are properly SWIP'ed.Define "properly". The Cox addresses in my example are SWIPed. Are
they "properly" SWIPed? How could you tell from whois?
Are is/are the exact prefix(es) in question? - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.0 (Build 214) wj8DBQFGGGJtq1pz9mNUZTMRAqEvAKDc2heZ5tTCZPkJXP1BkKiCQbjpwACg5+kA aMVT4/A79/VEZR8rKVv+AcY= =KafZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks, (continued)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Pete Templin (Apr 09)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks John L (Apr 09)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Chris Owen (Apr 09)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Pete Templin (Apr 09)
- RE: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Frank Bulk (Apr 09)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Chris Owen (Apr 09)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Chris Owen (Apr 07)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 09)
- RE: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks michael.dillon (Apr 10)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Joseph S D Yao (Apr 10)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Stephen Satchell (Apr 10)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks J. Oquendo (Apr 11)
- RE: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks michael.dillon (Apr 11)