nanog mailing list archives

RE: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks


From: <michael.dillon () bt com>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 21:39:26 +0100


I would have to respectfully disagree with you. When network
operators do due diligence and SWIP their sub-allocations, they
(the sub-allocations) should be authoritative in regards to things
like RBLs.

How do you tell when they have actually done "due diligence".

Existence of a SWIP record is essentially meaningless in this day and
age. Many people do them automatically and there may well be nobody left
on staff who knows that this is happening or what it all means.

--Michael Dillon


Current thread: