nanog mailing list archives
Re: Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet
From: Joe Loiacono <jloiacon () csc com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:12:57 -0400
Large MTUs enable significant throughput performance enhancements for large data transfers over long round-trip times (RTTs.) The original question had to do with local subnet to local subnet where the difference would not be noticable. But for users transferring large data sets over long distances (e.g. LHC experimental data from CERN in France to universities in the US) large MTUs can make a big difference. For an excellent and detailed (though becoming dated) examination of this see: "Raising the Internet MTU" Matt Mathis, et. al. http://www.psc.edu/~mathis/MTU/ Joe Stephen Wilcox <steve () telecomplete co uk> Sent by: owner-nanog () merit edu 04/12/2007 01:45 PM To Keegan.Holley () sungard com cc NANOG list <nanog () merit edu> Subject Re: Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 11:34:43AM -0400, Keegan.Holley () sungard com wrote:
I think it's a great idea operationally, less work for the routers
and more
efficient use of bandwidth. It would also be useful to devise some
way to
at least partially reassemble fragmented frames at links capable of
large
MTU's.
I think you underestimate the memory and cpu required on large links to be able to buffer the data that would allow a reassembly by an intermediate router
Since most PC's are on a subnet with a MTU of 1500 (or 1519) packets would still be limited to 1500B or fragmented before they reach the
higher
speed links. The problem with bringing this to fruition in the
internet is
going to be cost and effort. The ATT's and Verizons of the world are
going
to see this as a major upgrade without much benefit or profit. The
Cisco's
and Junipers are going to say the same thing when they have to write
this
into their code plus interoperability with other vendors
implementations of
it.
I dont think any of the above will throw out any particular objection.. I think your problem is in figuring out a way to implement this globally and not break stuff which relies so heavily upon 1500 bytes much of which does not even cater for the possibility another MTU might be possible. Steve
Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com> Sent by: owner-nanog () merit edu 04/12/2007 05:20 AM To NANOG list <nanog () merit edu> cc Subject Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet Dear NANOGers, It irks me that today, the effective MTU of the internet is 1500 bytes, while more and more equipment can handle bigger packets. What do you guys think about a mechanism that allows hosts and routers on a subnet to automatically discover the MTU they can use towards other systems on the same subnet, so that: 1. It's no longer necessary to limit the subnet MTU to that of the least capable system 2. It's no longer necessary to manage 1500 byte+ MTUs manually Any additional issues that such a mechanism would have to address?
Current thread:
- RE: Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet, (continued)
- RE: Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet Leigh Porter (Apr 13)
- RE: Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 13)
- Re: Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet Stephen Sprunk (Apr 13)
- RE: Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet Lasher, Donn (Apr 13)
- Re: Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet Stephen Sprunk (Apr 13)
- Re: Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet Steve Meuse (Apr 13)
- Re: Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet Adrian Chadd (Apr 13)
- RE: Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet michael.dillon (Apr 13)
- Re: Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet Stephen Wilcox (Apr 12)
- Re: Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet Joe Loiacono (Apr 12)
- Re: Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 12)
- Re: Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet Joe Loiacono (Apr 12)
- Re: Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 12)
- Re: Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet Joe Loiacono (Apr 12)
- Re: Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet Daniel Senie (Apr 12)
- Re: Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet David W. Hankins (Apr 12)
- Re: Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet Daniel Senie (Apr 12)
- Re: Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet David W. Hankins (Apr 12)