nanog mailing list archives
Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 00:49:23 +0200
* Iljitsch van Beijnum:
Ok, I wasn't clear: the problem here is that both ARIN and RIPE claim net 25.0.0.0/8 as "their own".
This is pretty standard for European /8. 53/8 is yet another example (Germany has moved to five-digit zip codes since that entry was last updated). At a previous job, I tried to fix our netblocks in the ARIN database. It turned out that legal representation in the U.S. was necessary, so it wasn't worth the trouble. Fortunately, ERX cleaned it up for us a few years later. Looks like the legacy /8s still need to be ERXed.
Current thread:
- Question on 7.0.0.0/8 william(at)elan.net (Apr 13)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Jon R. Kibler (Apr 13)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 william(at)elan.net (Apr 14)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Adrian Chadd (Apr 14)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 14)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Alexander Harrowell (Apr 14)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 14)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Florian Weimer (Apr 14)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 14)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 michael.dillon (Apr 15)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Roland Dobbins (Apr 15)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Jim Popovitch (Apr 15)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Sean Donelan (Apr 15)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Chris L. Morrow (Apr 15)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 william(at)elan.net (Apr 15)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 william(at)elan.net (Apr 14)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 alex (Apr 15)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 michael.dillon (Apr 16)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Jon R. Kibler (Apr 13)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 william(at)elan.net (Apr 15)