nanog mailing list archives
RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8
From: <michael.dillon () bt com>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 22:58:39 +0100
We checked with IANA, ARIN, and the US DoD regarding 7.0.0.0/8. We were told that this netblock should not see the light of day,
10/8 used to be a DoD address block, but it was also used exclusively in their blacker networks and similar non-connected infrastructure. The result is that 10/8 was opened up for others to use as well. Could we do similar with 7/8? --Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8, (continued)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 michael.dillon (Apr 16)
- .uk SLD history (was Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8) Keith Mitchell (Apr 17)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Jeroen Massar (Apr 14)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Rob Thomas (Apr 14)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 David Conrad (Apr 14)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 14)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 David Conrad (Apr 14)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Paul Vixie (Apr 14)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Rob Thomas (Apr 14)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 william(at)elan.net (Apr 14)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 michael.dillon (Apr 15)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Jeroen Massar (Apr 15)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 michael.dillon (Apr 15)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Joseph S D Yao (Apr 16)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Scott Morris (Apr 16)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 michael.dillon (Apr 17)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Daniel Senie (Apr 15)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Tony Finch (Apr 15)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Stephen Stuart (Apr 15)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Joseph S D Yao (Apr 16)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Joseph S D Yao (Apr 16)