nanog mailing list archives
Re: [ppml] too many variables
From: Eliot Lear <lear () cisco com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:29:14 +0200
Leo Bicknell wrote:
To Bill's original e-mail. Can we count on 2x every 18 months going forward? No. But betting on 2x every 24 months, and accounting for the delta between currently shipping and currently available hardware seems completely reasonable when assessing the real problem.
This assumes "the real problem" is CPU performance, where many have argued that the real problem is memory bandwidth. Memory doesn't track Moore's Law. Besides, Moore's Law isn't a law. What's your Plan B? This is where a lot of RRG/RAM work is going on right now.
Eliot
Current thread:
- Re: too many variables, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: too many variables Patrick Giagnocavo (Aug 09)
- Re: too many variables bmanning (Aug 09)
- Re: too many variables bmanning (Aug 09)
- Re: too many variables Wayne E. Bouchard (Aug 09)
- RE: too many variables Lincoln Dale (Aug 09)
- Re: too many variables Joel Jaeggli (Aug 09)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables Leo Bicknell (Aug 10)
- Message not available
- Re: [ppml] too many variables vijay gill (Aug 10)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables Leo Bicknell (Aug 10)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables vijay gill (Aug 10)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables Eliot Lear (Aug 13)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables Leo Bicknell (Aug 13)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables Eliot Lear (Aug 13)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables Cat Okita (Aug 13)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables Barry Shein (Aug 15)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables Scott Whyte (Aug 13)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables Leo Bicknell (Aug 14)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables Adrian Chadd (Aug 14)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables sthaug (Aug 14)
- Message not available
- Re: [ppml] too many variables Bruce M Simpson (Aug 24)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables Paul Vixie (Aug 10)