nanog mailing list archives
Re: Does anyone multihome anymore?
From: Mike Tancsa <mike () sentex net>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:16:26 -0400
At 02:12 PM 8/22/2007, Deepak Jain wrote:
Actually, in my case I dont think it would help because 577 has some sort of paid agreement with teleglobe and probably a very cheap (or even zero $$$) agreement with Cogent. So I dont think they would let me influence their exit path to make them pay Teleglobe more money :)Since AS577 keeps coming up in this discussion. They certainly could have adjusted their routing during this event if they felt their customers/business were being negatively impacted.If it didn't meet that threshold, who are we to judge what is good for their customers/business??
Hi, I am not judging them at all. Its all from my perspective--- me me me me!!! :)I am just trying to do the best for my customers and make a decent ROI for the business with the resources I have-- just like they are. From Bell's perspective, getting to relatively small networks like mine dont even register on their radar. I am just trying to do the best I can within the constraints of how routing works, and the tools I have available to me.
---Mike
Current thread:
- RE: Does anyone multihome anymore? David Hubbard (Aug 22)
- Message not available
- RE: Does anyone multihome anymore? Mike Tancsa (Aug 22)
- Re: Does anyone multihome anymore? Deepak Jain (Aug 22)
- Re: Does anyone multihome anymore? Mike Tancsa (Aug 22)
- RE: Does anyone multihome anymore? Mike Tancsa (Aug 22)
- Message not available