nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:25:07 -0400
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 23:56:29 MDT, John Osmon said:
Is anyone out there setting up routing boundaries differently for IPv4 and IPv6? I'm setting up a network where it seems to make sense to route IPv4, while bridging IPv6 -- but I can be talked out of it rather easily.
We decided to map our IPv6 subnets one-to-one to our IPv4, so each of our routed /22 to /27 subnets gets a /64 IPv6 prefix. This however was just due to the fact that our topology permitted that - your mileage may vary.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 John Osmon (Aug 25)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Peter Dambier (Aug 26)
- DECNet Good Old Days (spun from ...network boundaries...) James R. Cutler (Aug 26)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Kevin Oberman (Aug 26)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Jason LeBlanc (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 John Osmon (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Jason LeBlanc (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 John van Oppen (Aug 27)
- Any MSN/Live Mail Admin Contacts? Raymond L. Corbin (Aug 27)
- Re: Any MSN/Live Mail Admin Contacts? Martin Hannigan (Aug 27)
- Any MSN/Live Mail Admin Contacts? Raymond L. Corbin (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Peter Dambier (Aug 26)