nanog mailing list archives
RE: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey.
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 06:07:37 +0200 (CEST)
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Lincoln Dale wrote:
reason i ask is that since circa. 12.2(18)SXF9 (i.e. back in 2005), there has
One of the problems with this is that the people that have the tendency of not knowing their hardware limitations are the same people that will be running SXD because they haven't put CFs into their SUP:s to handle the larger image sizes of SXE and later.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey., (continued)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Jon Lewis (Aug 27)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Donald Stahl (Aug 27)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. John A. Kilpatrick (Aug 27)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. John Curran (Aug 27)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. William Herrin (Aug 28)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Mark Smith (Aug 28)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Eric Gauthier (Aug 28)
- RE: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Lincoln Dale (Aug 28)
- RE: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Donald Stahl (Aug 28)
- RE: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Lincoln Dale (Aug 28)
- RE: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 28)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. John A. Kilpatrick (Aug 29)