Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey.

[Deepak Jain <deepak () ai net>]

bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 06:48:43PM -0400, Jon Lewis wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, David Conrad wrote:
> >
> > > For a few more months.  What are upgrade cycles like again?  How common 
> > > are the MSFC2s?
> > I think we'll find out in a few months, when the "internet breaks" in a 
> > whole bunch of places where the admins aren't aware of this issue or 
> > operations have been downsized to the point that things are mostly on 
> > auto-pilot.  I'm guessing there are a good number of Sup2's in use, and 
> > that a good % of them think they're fine...as they have 512MB RAM and on 
> > the software based routers, that's plenty for current full BGP routes.
>
>         private replies suggest (w/ lots of handwaving) that perhaps 20-35%
>         of the forwarding engines in use might fit this catagory.
>
> > Anyone want to bet there will be people posting to nanog and cisco-nsp in 
> > a few months asking why either the CPU load on their Sup2's has suddenly 
> > shot up or why they keep noticing parts of the internet have gone 
> > unreachable?...oblivious to this thread.
>
>         that would be a sucker bet

If Cisco could ship enough units when asked, I'd say their next couple 
of quarters are in the bag... but since they have such huge lead 
times..... well, I am guessing a lot of people will start considering 
taking partial routes.

Transit providers would do well to have a distribute-list or similar 
configured to offer these guys when they call rather than trying to 
engineer something on an ICB basis.

Deepak