nanog mailing list archives
Re: the authors of RFC 2317 have a question for at&t worldnet
From: "Al Iverson" <aliversonchicagolists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:14:41 -0600
On 2/1/07, Paul Vixie <paul () vix com> wrote:
(and btw, if you're going to block inbound e-mail, you need to give senders some idea of how to get unblocked. not for fairness, just for practicality. and this parenthesized paragraph is why i count this screed as not-off-topic.)
Putting on my sender hat, I see that the URL you link to leads one to: http://www.att.net/general-info/mail_info/block_admin.html I've had some client issues in the past that have necessitated use of that process. I have found that AT&T is fairly responsive regarding sender blocking issues. There are many other ISPs whom I wish were as good at publishing info and offering a contact channel. Al Iverson -- Al Iverson on Spam and Deliverabilty, see http://www.spamresource.com Message copyright 2007 by Al Iverson. For posts to SPAM-L, permission is granted only to this lists's owners to redistribute to their sub- scribers and to archive this message on site(s) under their control.
Current thread:
- the authors of RFC 2317 have a question for at&t worldnet Paul Vixie (Feb 01)
- Re: the authors of RFC 2317 have a question for at&t worldnet Albert Meyer (Feb 01)
- Re: the authors of RFC 2317 have a question for at&t worldnet Al Iverson (Feb 01)