nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe?
From: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:32:43 -0500
Joe Abley <jabley () ca afilias info> writes:
i thought it was actually covered on-list... during the event, no?I don't think it was especially covered on this list (you are no doubt thinking of other lists). There was a lightning talk about it in Toronto, for which slides can be found in the usual place.
I think between the list and the lightning talk, it got the level of attention it deserved. ---rob
Current thread:
- DNS: Definitely Not Safe? MARLON BORBA (Feb 14)
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? Peter Dambier (Feb 14)
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Feb 14)
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? Paul Vixie (Feb 14)
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? Jim Popovitch (Feb 14)
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? Paul Vixie (Feb 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? MARLON BORBA (Feb 14)
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? Chris L. Morrow (Feb 14)
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? Joe Abley (Feb 14)
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? Chris L. Morrow (Feb 14)
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? Robert E. Seastrom (Feb 15)
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? Chris L. Morrow (Feb 14)
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? bmanning (Feb 14)
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? Scott Weeks (Feb 14)