nanog mailing list archives

Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons

From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 08:25:13 +0900

i know its all the rage to post/shame the offending parties (those
whois filtering policies don't reflect our own)


bull

we are trying to validate experimental results.  sorry if that
offends you or you do your research result validation differently.

randy

Current thread:

96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Eric Ortega (Feb 26)
- Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons James Blessing (Feb 26)
  - RE: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Eric Ortega (Feb 26)
    - RE: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Eric Ortega (Feb 28)
- RE: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Frank Bulk (Feb 26)
  - RE: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Randy Bush (Feb 26)
    - RE: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Frank Bulk (Feb 26)
    - Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons bmanning (Feb 26)
    - Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Randy Bush (Feb 26)
    - Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons bmanning (Feb 27)
    - Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Randy Bush (Feb 27)
    - Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons bmanning (Feb 27)
    - Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Randy Bush (Feb 27)
- Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Randy Bush (Feb 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Fergie (Feb 27)