nanog mailing list archives
Re: i wanna be a kpn peer
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:28:16 -1000
I don't think a spurious prefix directly injected into route-views is proof a network is broken.
we've had this discussion 42 times. it is not proof of anything and no one has said it is. but if it was one of my areas of responsibility leaking something strange, i sure would not mind folk mentioning it here. in fact, i would be greatful. randy
Current thread:
- i wanna be a kpn peer Randy Bush (Jan 10)
- Re: i wanna be a kpn peer Robert Boyle (Jan 10)
- Re: i wanna be a kpn peer Chris L. Morrow (Jan 10)
- Re: i wanna be a kpn peer Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 10)
- Re: i wanna be a kpn peer Randy Bush (Jan 10)
- Re: i wanna be a kpn peer Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 10)
- Re: i wanna be a kpn peer Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 10)
- Re: i wanna be a kpn peer Alexander Koch (Jan 10)
- Re: i wanna be a kpn peer Niels Bakker (Jan 11)
- Re: i wanna be a kpn peer David Freedman (Jan 12)