Re: Quick BGP peering question

[James Blessing <james.blessing () entagroup com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Neil J. McRae wrote:
> are you advertising them routes?
> If so then why wouldn't you expect traffic?

> > -----Original Message-----
> Very simply : Would you accept traffic from a customer who insists on
> sending 0
> prefixes across a BGP session?

Expecting the traffic is not a problem, just want some way of verifying that the
traffic isn't malicious/spoofed (e.g. by using unicast RPF or similar)

- --
COO
Entanet International
T: 0870 770 9580
http://www.enta.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFm7FaR+KszLBLUT8RAiD3AJ4u8/MIL3tuaJc2ZLZLJ9EsiKgROACcC9J9
L91GI1SQ4nYDwGhuxDuJBxA=
=4C4p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----