nanog mailing list archives
Re: NATting a whole country?
From: Vassili Tchersky <vt () phear org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 07:05:55 +0100
Le Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 07:07:22PM -0500, Joseph S D Yao a écrit :
I wonder what they use the other 241663 addresses for.Internal addressing, perhaps, if the AP story is correct.
Servers maybe ? I hope that they are not NATed. Taping devices may need a separate management address too :) -- Vassili Tchersky
Current thread:
- NATting a whole country? Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 03)
- Re: NATting a whole country? Gadi Evron (Jan 03)
- Re: NATting a whole country? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jan 03)
- Re: NATting a whole country? Joseph S D Yao (Jan 03)
- Re: NATting a whole country? Vassili Tchersky (Jan 03)
- Re: NATting a whole country? Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 03)
- Re: NATting a whole country? Michael . Dillon (Jan 04)
- Re: NATting a whole country? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jan 04)
- Re: NATting a whole country? Joseph S D Yao (Jan 03)
- Re: NATting a whole country? Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: NATting a whole country? Fergie (Jan 03)
- Re: NATting a whole country? Chris L. Morrow (Jan 03)
- Re: NATting a whole country? Scott Weeks (Jan 03)