nanog mailing list archives
Re: Why do we use facilities with EPO's?
From: Mattias Ahnberg <mattias () ahnberg pp se>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:33:04 +0200
Alex Rubenstein wrote:
EPO = SPOF = bad. We all know this.
I fail to see why one couldn't have TWO buttons of the same type that needed to be pressed after one another to close it down. It is unlikely that someone would trip and touch two separated buttons (although put close to one another). Probably some logic behind why we don't have this. Or not? -- /ahnberg.
Current thread:
- Re: Why do we use facilities with EPO's?, (continued)
- Re: Why do we use facilities with EPO's? Roy (Jul 25)
- Re: Why do we use facilities with EPO's? David Lesher (Jul 25)
- Re: Why do we use facilities with EPO's? Stephen Wilcox (Jul 26)
- Re: Why do we use facilities with EPO's? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 26)
- Re: Why do we use facilities with EPO's? Warren Kumari (Jul 26)
- RE: Why do we use facilities with EPO's? Howard C. Berkowitz (Jul 26)
- Re: Why do we use facilities with EPO's? Roy (Jul 25)
- Re: Why do we use facilities with EPO's? Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 25)
- Re: Why do we use facilities with EPO's? Warren Kumari (Jul 25)
- RE: Why do we use facilities with EPO's? Alex Rubenstein (Jul 25)
- Re: Why do we use facilities with EPO's? Mattias Ahnberg (Jul 26)
- Re: Why do we use facilities with EPO's? Alexander Harrowell (Jul 27)
- Re: Why do we use facilities with EPO's? chuck goolsbee (Jul 25)
- Re: Why do we use facilities with EPO's? Jerry Pasker (Jul 25)
- Re: Why do we use facilities with EPO's? Jason LeBlanc (Jul 26)