nanog mailing list archives
Re: Level(3) faux paux
From: Charles Yamasaki <charles.yamasaki () move com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 23:22:16 -0700
Cuz they are taking over at a rate that their best engineers canĀ¹t meet. On 7/11/07 11:08 PM, "Chris L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () verizonbusiness com> wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Security Admin (NetSec) wrote:I have noticed that Level(3) misconfigs/outages seem to happen more frequently than with most other Tier 1's. Am unsure whether or not thismaybe they have a larger change-rate? or more folks that notice problems and complain here? (note that I don't know but suspect everyone has a relatively close approximation of this figure at a certain place in the network-size-tiering)show up more often with issues than say Sprint [AS1239]. Is their any(cause they don't let Ted on routers anymore...)one (or any coporation) that keeps track of outages such as these? Would think it might be a good thing to know for proper mulit-homing relationships to minimize the type of outage that Yahoo faced...Because someone 3 as-hops away sucking down your prefix and traffic is your direct provider's problem how? -Chris
Current thread:
- Level(3) faux paux Security Admin (NetSec) (Jul 11)
- Re: Level(3) faux paux Chris L. Morrow (Jul 11)
- Re: Level(3) faux paux Charles Yamasaki (Jul 11)
- Re: Level(3) faux paux trainier (Jul 12)
- Re: Level(3) faux paux Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Level(3) faux paux Neil J. McRae (Jul 11)
- RE: Level(3) faux paux David Hubbard (Jul 12)
- Re: Level(3) faux paux Chris L. Morrow (Jul 11)