Re: Security gain from NAT

[Sam Stickland <sam_mailinglists () spacething org>]

Matthew Palmer wrote:
> I can think of one counter-example to this argument, and that's
> SSL-protected services, where having a proxy, transparent or otherwise, in
> your data stream just isn't going to work.  
Not so. Look at: http://muffin.doit.org/docs/rfc/tunneling_ssl.html

S