nanog mailing list archives
Re: ULA BoF
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 00:47:57 +0200
On 2-jun-2007, at 0:34, Randy Bush wrote:
[ i do not see mail from the respondent. and this reminds me why ]
Hm, I wonder what it is that I did to deserve that and who else I share this special status with.
How exactly are the opinions of people who operate ISP networks aboutwe still need a operator to make a short summary preso extolling the virtues of ula central at the bof.address space that's never used on the internet relevant?
1) He never specified that the operator had to operate an _ISP_ network.
I would invite him to specify the type of operator he had in mind, along with the consideration that assuming public IP network for that isn't entirely unexpected on this list, but apparently, that won't do much good.
Current thread:
- Re: ULA BoF Randy Bush (Jun 01)
- Re: ULA BoF Owen DeLong (Jun 01)
- Re: ULA BoF Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 01)
- Re: ULA BoF Steve Feldman (Jun 01)
- Re: ULA BoF Randy Bush (Jun 01)
- Re: ULA BoF Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 01)
- Re: ULA BoF Steve Feldman (Jun 01)
- Re: ULA BoF Joel Jaeggli (Jun 01)
- Re: ULA BoF Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 01)
- Re: ULA BoF Fred Baker (Jun 01)
- Re: ULA BoF Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 02)
- Re: ULA BoF Paul Vixie (Jun 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: ULA BoF Azinger, Marla (Jun 01)