nanog mailing list archives
Re: UK ISPs v. US ISPs (was RE: Network Level Content Blocking)
From: "Alexander Harrowell" <a.harrowell () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 01:19:50 +0100
On 6/10/07, William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson () gmail com> wrote:
Sean Donelan wrote: > UK ISP associations have developed a centralized blocking solution with > IWF providing the decision making of what to filter. 90% of the UK > broadband users accept the same "voluntary" decisions about what to filter. > I have not seen any evidence presented that *any* "UK broadband users" either *know* about or "accept" the "voluntary" decisions of their ISP, made for them in their 'Net Nanny role. Could you point to the URL for this scientific polling data?
I learned of it this week from NANOG and UKNOF.
Current thread:
- Re: UK ISPs v. US ISPs (was RE: Network Level Content Blocking), (continued)
- Re: UK ISPs v. US ISPs (was RE: Network Level Content Blocking) Mark Smith (Jun 11)
- Re: UK ISPs v. US ISPs (was RE: Network Level Content Blocking) Keegan . Holley (Jun 11)
- Re: UK ISPs v. US ISPs (was RE: Network Level Content Blocking) Kradorex Xeron (Jun 09)
- Re: UK ISPs v. US ISPs (was RE: Network Level Content Blocking) Stephen Sprunk (Jun 09)
- Re: UK ISPs v. US ISPs (was RE: Network Level Content Blocking) John Levine (Jun 11)
- Re: UK ISPs v. US ISPs (was RE: Network Level Content Blocking) Barry Shein (Jun 11)
- Re: UK ISPs v. US ISPs (was RE: Network Level Content Blocking) John Levine (Jun 11)
- Re: UK ISPs v. US ISPs (was RE: Network Level Content Blocking) Roland Perry (Jun 12)
- Duties of US ISPs Sean Donelan (Jun 12)
- Re: UK ISPs v. US ISPs (was RE: Network Level Content Blocking) William Allen Simpson (Jun 09)
- Re: UK ISPs v. US ISPs (was RE: Network Level Content Blocking) Alexander Harrowell (Jun 09)