nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 02 Jun 2007 17:54:04 +0000
how much of the v4 prefix count is de-aggregation for te or by TWits? why won't they do this in v6?you mean like: AS4755 AS4134 AS18566 AS4323 AS9498 AS6478 AS11492 AS22773 AS8151 AS19262 AS6197 I'm sure they'll claim they have valid business reasons.
i wish that the community had the means to do revenue sharing with such folks. carrying someone else's TE routes is a global cost for a point benefit. -- Paul Vixie
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted, (continued)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted John Curran (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Stephen Sprunk (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Kradorex Xeron (Jun 02)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (Jun 02)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted John Curran (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Joel Jaeggli (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Paul Vixie (Jun 02)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Petri Helenius (Jun 02)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Paul Vixie (Jun 02)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Stephen Sprunk (Jun 01)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (Jun 02)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 04)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Nathan Ward (Jun 02)
- Re: NAT Multihoming (was:Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted) Paul Vixie (Jun 02)
- Re: NAT Multihoming (was:Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted) Donald Stahl (Jun 02)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Simon Leinen (Jun 03)