nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted
From: Donald Stahl <don () calis blacksun org>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 15:35:29 -0400 (EDT)
I don't know what load balancer you use but all the testing I've done with my F5's has worked out. Granted I'm sure I've forgotten to test some stuff along they way but it simply hasn't been an issue during the initial testing. Considering they support IPv6 gateway and IPv6 proxy modules you can generally make things work in your environment.Not speaking directly for my employer (in any official capacity that is), but it's is *not* as easy as as just IPv6 enabling our network, enabling ipv6 on the servers, and putting up ipv6.yahoo.com. Currently, the biggest roadblock we have is loadbalancer support (or, more specificly, lack of thereof) for IPv6 (hell, we still can't even get a
I would like to know when Foundry's LB's are going to support IPv6 (unless I missed an announcement they still don't).
That said- your v6 support does not have to match your v4 support to at least allow you to begin testing. You could set up a single server with v6 support, test, and not worry about it affecting production.
Obviously the drive and motivation is different for different companies. Personally- I just want to get it implemented sooner rather than later so I have as much time as possible to track down bugs before normal people start using it.
-Don
Current thread:
- Re: NAT Multihoming (was:Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted), (continued)
- Re: NAT Multihoming (was:Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted) Donald Stahl (Jun 02)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Simon Leinen (Jun 03)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Chris Owen (Jun 03)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Randy Bush (Jun 03)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Stephen Satchell (Jun 03)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jun 04)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Donald Stahl (Jun 04)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 04)
- Re: NAT Multihoming (was:Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted) Donald Stahl (Jun 02)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Donald Stahl (Jun 03)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (Jun 03)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Igor Gashinsky (Jun 03)
- IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted michael.dillon (Jun 03)
- Re: IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Jun 03)
- Re: IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted Igor Gashinsky (Jun 03)
- Re: IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted John Curran (Jun 03)
- Re: IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted matthew zeier (Jun 03)
- Re: IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted william(at)elan.net (Jun 03)
- Re: IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted matthew zeier (Jun 03)
- Re: IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Jun 04)