nanog mailing list archives

Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law.

From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 06:04:25 +0100

Nothing is wrong with what he posted.  The guy is a moron.  However, I 
was taking my 15 min of fame to jab at SORBS policy of listing people on 
their respective lists.


when 42 other folk have similarly whined, i am not sure the word 'fame'
is appropriate

randy

Current thread:

Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Matthew Sullivan (Mar 15)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. S. Ryan (Mar 15)
  - Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Steve Sobol (Mar 15)
    - Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. S. Ryan (Mar 15)
    - Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Steve Sobol (Mar 15)
    - Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Randy Bush (Mar 15)
    - Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Rich Kulawiec (Mar 16)
    - Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Peter Corlett (Mar 17)
    - Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Rich Kulawiec (Mar 17)
    - Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Tony Finch (Mar 17)
    - Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Matthew Sullivan (Mar 17)
    - RE: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Andrew Kirch (Mar 16)
    - Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Nachman Yaakov Ziskind (Mar 15)
    - Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Matthew Sullivan (Mar 16)