nanog mailing list archives
Re: single homed public-peer bandwidth ... pricing survey ?
From: John Osmon <josmon () rigozsaurus com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 16:23:52 -0700
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:51:39PM -0800, Jason Arnaute wrote: [...]
Or am I just getting ripped off ?
I have actually seen contracts that have current pricing over $200/Mbps -- but the person responsible isn't allowed to "negotiate" on transit prices anymore. :-) (To be fair, at the time the contract was signed, the price was only about double market pricing...) No, I'm not bitter. Bitter is for much lighter feelings than I have at the momment... Oh, to un-hijack the thread: I'd start getting some competitive bids.
Current thread:
- single homed public-peer bandwidth ... pricing survey ? Jason Arnaute (Mar 06)
- Re: single homed public-peer bandwidth ... pricing survey ? Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 06)
- RE: single homed public-peer bandwidth ... pricing survey ? Joseph Jackson (Mar 06)
- Re: single homed public-peer bandwidth ... pricing survey ? Joseph S D Yao (Mar 06)
- Re: single homed public-peer bandwidth ... pricing survey ? John Osmon (Mar 06)
- Re: single homed public-peer bandwidth ... pricing survey ? Matthew Crocker (Mar 06)
- Re: single homed public-peer bandwidth ... pricing survey ? Andy Davidson (Mar 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: single homed public-peer bandwidth ... pricing survey ? Jason Arnaute (Mar 06)
- Re: single homed public-peer bandwidth ... pricing survey ? Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 06)
- Re: single homed public-peer bandwidth ... pricing survey ? Justin M. Streiner (Mar 06)
- Re: single homed public-peer bandwidth ... pricing survey ? Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 06)