nanog mailing list archives
Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20?
From: Neal Rauhauser <neal () lists rauhauser net>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 15:33:40 -0400
I don't know much about Juniper but I'm about to learn with a new job. If I'm going to take full routes from a couple of upstreams and have a couple of peers will the M10i (768M max) be enough or is the M20 (2048M max) a better choice. Layout here is such that I'd expect to use a single quad gigabit port ethernet blade in each of a pair of M10i/M20 to achieve redundancy.
Is there a pricing resource for this stuff online some where? I do *not* want to hear from any sales people over this comment ...
Current thread:
- Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Neal Rauhauser (May 13)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Joe Abley (May 13)
- Message not available
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Neal Rauhauser (May 13)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? sthaug (May 14)
- Message not available
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Joe Abley (May 13)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Donald Stahl (May 13)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Chris L. Morrow (May 13)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Donald Stahl (May 13)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Hyunseog Ryu (May 14)
- oversubscribed ports for Juniper are a new feature Neal Rauhauser (May 14)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Chris L. Morrow (May 13)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Donald Stahl (May 14)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Warren Kumari (May 15)