nanog mailing list archives
RE: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing
From: Brandon Butterworth <brandon () rd bbc co uk>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 09:15:09 +0100 (BST)
But for the sanity and comfort of other list users, would it be too much to ask that people with annoying tacked-on .sig's use a personal mail account when posting to the list? I hear Google offers nice email accounts for a reasonable price.
That often results in people sending html instead of a legal sig. People who filter on such sigs are likely to filter on html too. People who don't filter on sigs do filter on html. Choose your evils carefully. brandon
Current thread:
- Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing, (continued)
- Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing Ron da Silva (May 02)
- Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing Martin Hannigan (May 02)
- Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing Scott Weeks (May 02)
- Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing Ron da Silva (May 02)
- Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing Jay Hennigan (May 02)
- Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing Warren Kumari (May 02)
- RE: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing andrew2 (May 02)
- Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing Warren Kumari (May 02)
- E-mail addresses and signatures [was: RE: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing] Steve Gibbard (May 04)
- Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing Ron da Silva (May 02)
- Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing Scott Weeks (May 02)
- RE: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing Brandon Butterworth (May 04)