nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP CALEA compliance
From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 09:01:26 +0530
On 5/24/07, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
The more I think about this, the more I think a refereed boxing^h^h^h^h^h^hpanel discussion between representatives from DHS, FBI, EFF, FCC, Verisign, Neustar, and ITU might be a good approach to this.
Humor me.. but just where does ITU come into this whole mess? -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance, (continued)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Sean Donelan (May 11)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Mike Hammett (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jason Frisvold (May 11)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Steven M. Bellovin (May 11)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Martin Hannigan (May 12)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Joe Provo (May 12)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Martin Hannigan (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Randy Bush (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Albert Meyer (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Owen DeLong (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Valdis . Kletnieks (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Andy Davidson (May 24)